The Discount for Illiquidity and
Jerry Seinfeld
Let us forget
about gifts for a moment and think about equity valuation.
Suppose you
had the ability to acquire one of two securities. Both securities are in
companies that are exactly the same in every way (Company A and Company B) –
they are in the same line of business, have the same assets and liabilities,
and earn the same amount of income each year. Each company will pay the holder
of the security $1,000 per year into perpetuity. The only difference between
the two investments is that the holder of the shares of Company B is restricted
from selling them for 2 years, while the holder of the shares of Company A has
no such restrictions.
Clearly, you
would rather own the shares of Company A than Company B, since those of Company
A are identical to those of Company B, only they carry no restrictions. Precisely
how much more you would pay for the more “liquid” shares of Company A has been
a matter of debate within the valuation profession for a number of years, and I
have written a lengthy article on the subject (here). In brief, the main sources of data
on this discount are so-called “restricted stock” studies. These studies look at the price at which
“restricted stock” is issued in private placements to accredited investors,
relative to the current market price of that stock on the public exchanges. For
example, if shares of a public company trade at $100 per share, and restricted
stock are sold at $80 per share, then the illiquidity discount is $20, or 20%.
How useful are restricted stock studies? One analysis questions their
validity. It shows[1]
that the firms that issue restricted stock in private placements tend to be
predominantly small firms listed “over-the-counter”. It concludes that much of
the “discount” observed on these private placements is due to:
· The relatively poor financial position of the issuing company, and hence
its poor bargaining position when it comes to issuing new equity; and,
· The fact that the observed market price for unrestricted shares
of these companies (against which the restricted stock discount is calculated)
is itself unrepresentative of the fair market value of those shares.
The Discount on Gift Cards
What does
all this have to do with gift cards? It is many years since the great
contemporary thinker and social critic, Dilbert, noted that gift certificates
are “like money, only worse” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCvR9_W9osw). Like money, they can be used to
purchase goods and services; but unlike money, they can only be used to make
purchases from the issuing business. Gift cards are illiquid; they are in many
ways like restricted stock. If you recognize the value of liquidity, you will
agree with Jerry Seinfeld that cash makes the perfect gift: (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQlhrrqTQmU). Elaine’s reaction betrays a basic
unawareness of valuation theory.
So what is
the discount for illiquidity on gift cards? How much would you be willing to
sell a $100 gift certificate for? It will probably depend on a number of
factors:
·
If
the card is for a store at which you regularly shop, you may not be
willing to sell it for much less than $100.
·
If
the card is for a store at which you are likely to shop, but only irregularly,
then you may be willing to accept a larger discount, in particular if you
are short on cash.
o
For
example, I buy my groceries at No Frills and my shoes at the Shoe Company. But
I buy groceries every week, and shoes (very) infrequently. I would not sell a No Frills gift card for
less than face value, since I can redeem the full face value in a very short
period of time. But I would be glad to get rid of a Shoe Company gift card,
which I may not use for a few years, for more of a discount. And if I needed to
make a big purchase and was short of funds, I would be willing to take an ever
steeper discount.
·
If
the card is for a large chain, it will require a smaller discount than a card
for a small, speciality store.
o
Cards
for large chains are easy to use. Even if the seller does not regularly shop at
the chain, many others do, and the card should be easier to unload.
In order to
see this phenomenon in effect, you can look at some of the websites that buy
and sell gift cards. At www.giftrescue.com, gift cards for gasoline sell at a
discount of 3%, while cards for more specialized consumer goods such as
clothing can be had for discounts of 35% to 40%. On http://www.cardswap.ca/buy/list, it is grocery gift cards that trade
closest to their face value.
How is this relevant for equity valuations? It suggests that the value of liquidity is investor-specific. The discount given by firms issuing illiquid stock will depend on how badly they need immediate cash. And the illiquidity discount that a purchaser or owner of that stock might apply in valuing it will depend on how much they require liquidity.Conclusion
So how valuable
is liquidity? The short answer is that, with investments as with gift cards: it
depends.
[1] Robert Comment, “Revisiting the Illiquidity Discount for Private
Companies: A New (and “Skeptical”) Restricted Stock Study”, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance,
24:1 (Winter 2012);
No comments:
Post a Comment